ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã

Our Network

by Meridith Levinson

More on Organizational Realignments and How They Affect ÍæÅ¼½ã½ãs

Opinion
Jun 2, 20083 mins

ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã

IT leaders are well-positioned to benefit from and facilitate organizational changes inside their companies, according to one executive recruiter.

In May, three ÍæÅ¼½ã½ãs earned promotions amidst management realignments at their companies:

  • At AmerisourceBergen, senior VP and ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã Tom Murphy was given additional responsibility for the pharmaceutical company’s multi-year process improvement project, which includes the design of an ERP system.
  • Flower Foods, a manufacturer of supermarket baked goods, made its ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã, Vyto Rasminas, a senior vice president.
  • Don Nelson was promoted from vice president of capabilities development to ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã at graphic design services provider VistaPrint.
The realignments or restructurings of these companies were effected to position each company for growth, and in AmerisourceBergen’s case, to also streamline its organizational structure.

Paul Groce, the leader of executive search firm CTPartners’ ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã practice, says he hasn’t noticed a sudden uptick in organizational realignments, but he adds, weak economic conditions can pressure organizations (especially those that have been through mergers or acquisitions, for example) to achieve the efficiencies and economies of scale those mergers and acquisitions promised. And that may explain why ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã.com noticed three announcements about such realignments in May.

“In many cases, it takes senior management a certain period of time to realign internal structures to facilitate the merger and integration of companies they may have acquired,” says Groce. “Stakeholders in the company are going to be more insistent on these changes and of efficiencies occurring when they’re concerned returns might not be as great as they would be in good [economic] times.”

Groce says ÍæÅ¼½ã½ãs are well-positioned to benefit from organizational realignments. Because they oversee technology for all functions inside the company, he says, ÍæÅ¼½ã½ãs have a first-hand view of how their organizations can “drive huge efficiencies” by aggregating and consolidating disparate finance, HR and supply chain systems. Such changes can be the catalyst for new organizational structures.

“Never assume that your technology solutions have to fit the existing [organizational] structure,” Groce advises ÍæÅ¼½ã½ãs who wish to benefit from organizational realignments. In fact, he says, ÍæÅ¼½ã½ãs can be the ones who spark the realignment.

“If the ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã of a multinational, multi-divisional company can convince everyone that compliance, HR and financial systems can run on a single platform, the CEO may decide to consolidate and run the company as one,” he says. “The ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã can say, We really can do this.”

Groce notes that it wasn’t possible to achieve such efficiencies 10 years ago because technology wasn’t mature enough to support such realignments or companies’ reporting requirements. “10 years ago such a move would have just created confusion, but today you can truly supplant the layers, the redundancies in management and in geographies with technology, he says. “Hence the reason other people move out and the ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã remains and moves up.”